This tribe has been resurrected

topic posted Tue, November 7, 2006 - 2:43 PM by 
That is if you want it to be and contribute which I hope that you will. There will be no more spam, bashing or psycho threads tolerated. Let us get this back to its original intent, is the nice guy defunct & if so why, if not where is he and how can he be spotted.
posted by:
  • Re: This tribe has been resurrected

    Wed, November 8, 2006 - 3:51 PM
    Hmm... will there be more in-depth discussion of all things Nice Guy or is it all just going to be rehashing of everything that's already been discussed?
    • Re: This tribe has been resurrected

      Wed, November 8, 2006 - 3:57 PM
      I am hoping for new and fresh perspectives & discussions as opposed to simple rehashing
      • Re: This tribe has been resurrected

        Mon, November 20, 2006 - 1:58 PM
        Yes, please, no rehash.
        I gave up following this tribe because it just seemed like everyone had an axe to grind.
        I still believe there are nice guys out there.
        -L
        • Unsu...
           

          Re: This tribe has been resurrected

          Sun, November 26, 2006 - 7:31 PM
          I believe there are nice guys out there, too -- I'm just not sure where to find them...
          • Re: This tribe has been resurrected

            Sun, November 26, 2006 - 8:18 PM
            <<I believe there are nice guys out there, too -- I'm just not sure where to find them...>>

            We are everywhere, even online
            • Unsu...
               

              Re: This tribe has been resurrected

              Mon, November 27, 2006 - 9:26 PM
              Simon, I know that you're right, but I'll have to readjust my technique to find them here. I'm pretty new to Tribe, and I'm still learning what NOT to do. Last week I made the mistake of posting on a sex-related tribe, which unleashed a barrage of messages from a guy who seemed cool, at first. I was enjoying the flirtation, and the possibility of finding someone who might be a good match tickled me.

              Then, after about 3 days of flirtatious messaging back and forth, he finally admits that in addition to living about 90 miles away, he's married....and he has 2 kids. But he didn't understand why I was alarmed by that, or why I told him to stop sending me messages. He sent me multiple messages stating his case: "my wife doesn't understand my needs," blah blah. I tried to be platonic with him, but it became clear to me that he has NO real interest in me or who I am. He's looking for an easy shag, and I have no desire to join the DMC (Dirty Mistress Club, for those non-Grey's Anatomy watchers among us). So I blocked him. *sigh* Removed myself from the tribe that got me into this mess, too....won't be there again. (I'll keep my libido under wraps until the right guy appears.)

              This WAS partly my fault, but I also feel terribly disappointed. I can be a dumb bunny girl sometimes, always expecting guys to be up-front and direct. Silly rabbit, feh. So how do I re-calibrate my great-guy radar? I don't want to find myself in a situation like that again.
              • Unsu...
                 

                Re: This tribe has been resurrected

                Mon, November 27, 2006 - 10:42 PM
                Lucky you! He admitted it up front before you were involved, LOL! Take it slow. Get to know people the best you can here. Don't put your life on hold waiting for the right nice guy, do the things you enjoy. If you love music festivals, go to music festivals. If you like art, go to museums. Better still might be to volunteer in some place you love. Anything that will put you in places doing things you love will necessarily have you meeting people who also love the same thing.

                I recommend one inactive thing and one active thing. Reason being is that disability or injury can happen to anyone at any time. Some of us had been discussing on the Pain tribe about how "friends" left after we were injured or disabled. Well, that's kind of going to happen if your whole life centers around very active things. They aren't going to be content to sit still and you might not be able to do those things for awhile, or again.

                Inactive things are MENTAL things. You'll probably always be able to read a book. Watch films. Take drives. Maybe photography. Any kinds of board or card games. So if you end up not being able to run marathons, you'll still have friends and things to do and you won't be stuck home like me!

                My folks used to do bridge games at each other's house and it was a fun thing for them. Friends would do card games as well. Lots of fun board games. I always see pictures of men playing chess in the park. I have no idea where that is, but if you got into that habit, you'd be in a lovely park enjoying the weather, exercising your mind, being with friends. If you love all those things, parks, outdoors, mind challenges, different people, YOU WOULD MEET OTHER PEOPLE LIKE THAT.

                There are often single's activities that are around more than "forced chat". Bicycling, hiking, walking, jogging. So you're still doing something you enjoy, in the company of other people, in a somewhat less meat-market-like atmosphere. I always wondered if you meet someone and started regularly dating them if you'd get kicked out of the single's group. Hah!

                Anything sound good?
      • Re: This tribe has been resurrected

        Mon, November 20, 2006 - 2:40 PM
        Simon, I'd have to say that I support the first few moves you've done so far. Do you plan to change the tribe description at all?
        • Re: This tribe has been resurrected

          Mon, November 20, 2006 - 2:49 PM
          Would you like a new tribe description? What sort of changes would you like to see reflected in it?
          • Re: This tribe has been resurrected

            Mon, November 20, 2006 - 7:08 PM
            Incorporating what you said at the beginning of this thread might be a start.

            Also, a deeper definition of bashing and respectful would be good too. For instance, we each know what it feels to be bashed but that doesn't mean that anyone else understands that specifically. Spelling it out might be helpful as best you can...in the tribe description. Of course, if you are going to run things looser than that and not on too much of a "legalistic" basis, that would be good to know too.

            The original purpose of this tribe was to discuss passive-aggression. It eventually morphed into a venue in which >demonstrating< passive-aggression seemed to be the end product, rather than folks moving forward. It also may just be that some folks moved forward and on and others just left in disgust. Our "sister" tribe tribers pretty much dropped out and that tribe too has also become fairly silent as well...with the exception of Kim and possibly a few others.

            You might also want to announce in that tribe, "The Mythical Nice Girl" tribe that our tribe is under new management, etc once you've had a few weeks to settle in.

            I am hopeful that some of the camaraderie and positive experiences that did come from this tribe in 2004 might somehow make its way back into the psychie of many of us who need some positive reinforcement, some good resources to move on with our problems, etc.

            Anyone else got a perspective to add to this?
            • Re: This tribe has been resurrected

              Mon, November 27, 2006 - 11:48 AM
              Wow. I just had a total epiphany when reading this post:
              "The original purpose of this tribe was to discuss passive-aggression."

              *Ding*

              It's so odd, I never knew that was the stated purpose, but it certainly turned out that way, didn't it?
              Everything makes sense now.

              I came here looking for what I thought still existed (but can't seem to find for myself): intelligent, interesting, fun guys, who are also "nice" and by that I mean honest/integrity/compassion for others. (Had enough of the moody bad boys, thanks; looking for confirmation the nice ones are still out there.)

              What I found was a LOT of passive aggression, and it made me angry and sad, so I stopped paying attention.

              Weird. I feel so enlightened now. Thanks for stating that.
              Cheers.
              • Re: This tribe has been resurrected

                Mon, November 27, 2006 - 1:56 PM
                <<I came here looking for what I thought still existed (but can't seem to find for myself): intelligent, interesting, fun guys, who are also "nice" and by that I mean honest/integrity/compassion for others. (Had enough of the moody bad boys, thanks; looking for confirmation the nice ones are still out there>>

                Well lets get back to us honest, compassionate nice guys with integrity, since we definitely do exist.

                passive aggressive is far to draining to deal with or to maintain a tribe - IMO
                • Re: This tribe has been resurrected

                  Tue, November 28, 2006 - 1:01 PM
                  Look, Simon, if you look in the archives you can see that there were really good discussions by men and women in this tribe in the past. And they were about expressing honest (we hope) emotional issues on intimacy, sex, relationships, etc. That was really good.

                  But, and here is the problem when there is a tribe with this title that is open to the public, we get folks who come in and whine about something having to do with women and men and they don't want to solve it. Sure, there are folks who do want to figure out what is wrong in their relationships but then there are others who just want to blame someone besides themselves...no matter what. And we also got trollers who just try to be nasty for the heck of it. So, I guess, I was a bit put off by what has happened over the past year or so here and I apologize for being cynical because of it.

                  But what is called nice and what is nice are two different things. And that is where the term 'mythical' gets its origins. And that is what I meant about my comments above about passive-aggression. What is the difference between passive-aggression and being nice--that is the rub.

                  So, yes, by all means, let's raise some guys to the fore and say, "Wow! Great guy!" Explaining why someone is great is also cool. But also explaining why someone feels that they are continually getting burned or doesn't even realize why they feel that they may be getting burned when they feel they are 'doing the right thing' or 'being nice' is also important so that those of us who may or may not be all that nice can figure out the difference between formulae and actual successful relationships, both with ourselves and each other.
                  • This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.

                    Re: This tribe has been resurrected

                    Wed, November 29, 2006 - 12:49 PM
                    I understand that we have had whiners and trolls in the recent past unfortunately, I do not plan on letting that continue though. First sign of a troll & they will be deleted. I would prefer to keep this a public tribe, attract new members - if it does become a problem with trolls though I will switch over to moderated.
                    • Re: This tribe has been resurrected

                      Wed, November 29, 2006 - 4:59 PM
                      Thank you, Simon!

                      Those shmucks need to be sent back to their respective homes under various bridges.
                      • Re: This tribe has been resurrected

                        Wed, December 27, 2006 - 1:58 PM
                        Please define troll then! I tried to post a topic...but then for some reason it seemed to be okay for someone to go off on a drama tangent. What exactly would trolling entail in this tribe?
                        • Re: This tribe has been resurrected

                          Wed, December 27, 2006 - 2:20 PM
                          I noticed the drama tangent, though not as bad as in the past, to be honest though I debated about deletion I don't want to stifle or kill this tribe since posting is sparce so I have left the posts / poster longer than I normally would have.
      • Re: This tribe has been resurrected

        Sat, November 25, 2006 - 3:13 PM
        I wonder why there is such duality surrounding the concept "nice?" On one hand, we're taught to "play nice" (as a positive), yet "being nice" is often equated with being a milquetoast.

        How do we separate out "nice," meaning "compassionate, understanding and respectful" from the "nice" that's interpreted as "weak, opinionless and boring?"
    • Re: This tribe has been resurrected

      Thu, November 16, 2006 - 9:58 PM
      Here are a few.

      Why are (self proclaimed or otherwise) nice guys almost universally looked at in the negative, while (self proclaimed or otherwise) nice girls aren't?

      Why do serial killers get more female admirers than a "whiny" nice guy?

      There's a few.
      • Unsu...
         

        Is this mostly guys here???

        Sun, November 26, 2006 - 2:29 AM
        I'm not a guy. But I caught this thread yesterday and saw a couple things I wanted to respond to.

        I don't know what has been covered before, but I'm tossing this out, at "The L"

        Nice girls are not perceived as positive. Not on Tribe.net anyway. Start window shopping in the photo galleries of tribes and in people's profiles and most of what you'll see are people that tend to appear to be of questionable moral character. Guys and gals. And apparently THAT is what people want.

        Look at some of the major players in various tribes. It's not the nice people that are the popular people for the most part, is it? The nastier the person is, the more of a following they tend to get, eh? Why?

        Want to know how much crap I get for being "nice"? I get more crap for being nice than the mean people get for being mean. And yes, I do want people to be less predatory and TRIED to do that in my last tribe. I had a mix of people there, and some people just couldn't hold back on the trolly stuff. There's plenty of places to be vicious alts, I wanted my tribe to be "nice".

        The people that chose not to be nice were (and are) fully capable of being nice. I know, I'd talked to them before in PM. But it was like inviting a fox into a hen house and saying "be nice". I was so disappointed.

        And Peter says:

        "How do we separate out "nice," meaning "compassionate, understanding and respectful" from the "nice" that's interpreted as "weak, opinionless and boring?"

        Well, I guess the best way would be to define ourselves. Or to define those words for ourselves. What is "boring"? I'd probably bore the socks off most people. I'm not an action figure. I don't mountain climb, I haven't invented anything, I mean, I'm just not into a lot of those things that other people do.

        My advice continues to be that folks should do what pleases them and gives them fulfillment. If you are compassionate, then show that, in your life and do things that will allow you to use that part of you. It will necessarily put you in contact with other compassionate people.

        Some folks would consider reading to be boring. I like reading. So, if I wanted to meet other people who enjoyed reading, I would not go to a motocross event, a strip bar with guys, or a gym. I'd go to libraries, public poetry readings, find book clubs online or in person. So I could be around people who enjoy what I enjoy. With the Internet, we should be able to find most anything in our own areas or can participate online. And choose to be around the kind of NICE that we happen to be.

        I could go to a gal's group and we can reinforce each other's "niceness". LOL! For that matter, there could be mixed groups of "nice people" doing "nice things" nicely. Where nobody dresses like a street walker, where nobody swears all the time, and absolutely nobody crushes a beer can on their forehead. Or even a diet cola can on their forehead.

        We have well-developed brains, but a lot of people don't use them. They revert to some kind of animalistic behaviour where men fight and women fight too. Not just some of the time, but all the time. No cooperation, always competition. Where viciousness rules and nice people are trampled. I think that sucks.
      • Re: This tribe has been resurrected

        Sat, December 2, 2006 - 2:57 PM
        "Why are (self proclaimed or otherwise) nice guys almost universally looked at in the negative, while (self proclaimed or otherwise) nice girls aren't?"

        -Neither of those statements is true.

        1. Nice guys are not looked at negatively: passive-aggressive clingy whiny guys who call themselves "nice" are. No one was EVER dumped for being too nice, but they have been dumped for being submissive, codependent, jealous, and bland. Then they complain to the world that they were dumped for being "too nice", decide to be an asshole because "that's what girls apparently want", then get mad at having no success on that approach either and just get bitter. If more "nice" guys started seriously and honestly examining the reasons they have trouble dating, this whole "nice guy" stigma wouldn't even be an issue.

        Case in point: there's a guy that comes into one of the bars I work at, and he sits and complains about the lack of available women constantly. Every time he finds someone he's attracted to, he never asks her out BUT reserves the right to bitch for a week if someone else asks her and she says yes. He complains about how he saw her first, that other guy's just going to break her heart, she's probably a slut anyway, yadda yadda. Then he perks up, notices there are women around him, starts trying to flirt, and wonders why they're not interested. And he blames it on the fact that he's a nice guy, every time.

        2. "Nice" girls have the same stigma "nice" guys have, and for the same reasons. There is the added component that genuinely nice women also face dating trouble due to their views on sex and marriage, but that's true of everyone regardless fo what their views are: if you aren't dating someoen with the same views, you're going to have trouble.

        "Why do serial killers get more female admirers than a "whiny" nice guy?"

        -Wtf? Where are your stats on this?

        1. Serial killers will always attract a certain psychlogically damaged contingent of groupies. People are weird.

        2. "Whiny" people never have groupies because they are whiny. No whiny person in the history of the world has ever attracted a following, except maybe Rosanne and even that didn't last very long. Why is this even a question? Dear god.
        • Unsu...
           

          Re: This tribe has been resurrected

          Sat, December 2, 2006 - 3:34 PM
          GuessWho? says:

          "2. "Nice" girls have the same stigma "nice" guys have, and for the same reasons. There is the added component that genuinely nice women also face dating trouble due to their views on sex and marriage, but that's true of everyone regardless fo what their views are: if you aren't dating someoen with the same views, you're going to have trouble. "

          I understand the part about having trouble with dating people that don't share the same views, but what does "genuinely nice women also face dating trouble due to their views on sex and marriage" mean? Yes, I am serious. No, I don't know what it means for sure. I'm going to guess it's somewhat how I feel, which usually has me labeled as a "puritan". LOL!
          • Re: This tribe has been resurrected

            Sun, December 3, 2006 - 3:51 PM
            "I'm going to guess it's somewhat how I feel, which usually has me labeled as a "puritan". LOL!"

            That's kinda what I mean :) Stereotypical "nice girls" tend to automatically be viewed as being very consrvative in that arena. Is it a fair assumption? No. Is it fair that women who have different approaches to sex and marriage would be taken out of the "nice girl" cateogry? No.

            Bleh.

Recent topics in "The Mythical Nice Guy"